BIOSOLIDS/SLUDGE
A Water
Treatment Plant By-Product
Biosolids
Disposal
Governed under
the Environmental Protection Act
- Ministry of Environment. Also
administered by the Ministry of
Agriculture, Food and Rural
Afairs. Approved by the
Environmenal Assessment -
Approvals Branch of the MOE.
Medical Officer of Health - if
public health issue identified.
The biosolids can be disposed of
in three different ways:
Utilization vs
Disposal
Landfilling
biosolids provides no economic /
environmental benefit. As well,
landfilling concentrates disposed
material in a centralized area.
And incineration is not cost
effective. Utilization promotess
the three R's - Reduce, reuse and
recycle.
How Biosolids
Can Be Utilized?
Organic Soil
Conditioning vs. Fertilization.
Spreading or injection of
biosolids to agricultural land.
Active farming / crop planting
and rotation to make use of
available nutrients. Require
input from an agronomist for best
field application rates as per
requirements of specific crops.
Waste
Management System
Required for all
Organic Soil Conditiong Sites and
Systems
Approved
by Approvals Branch -
Toronto
Includes
vehicles used for
transportation and
spreading
All
disposal sites are
governed by Certificates
of Approval - issued by
regional Office of the
Ministry of Environment
Allows for the
use of biosolids for the purpose
of soil conditioning, for
agricultural purposes. It becomes
a living document, changes to
equipment or soil conditioning
sites can be reflected with
amendments.
Organic Soil
Conditioning Sites
Plots of land for
which a Certificate of Approval
has been issued. C. of A.'s are
issued by the Regional Office of
the ministry of Environment.
Desired - Not
Desired Constituents
Waste material
must provide nutrient benefit to
operation. Nutrient benefit must
be compared to fertilizer
application rate. Undesired
constituents - garbage, trash,
heavy metals, chemicals -
requires analysis of the waste
source (batch samples) prior to
approval.
Site
Assessment
Require
map, topographical, soil,
drainage
Terrain
description, site
physiology
Soil
description and depth
Presence
of groundewater table,
nearby surface water
bodies
Nearby
drinking water supplies
Clearance
distance
Soils
The ability of the environmnet to
absorb the effects of biosoild
utilization is reflected in the
ability of the soil to
treat/absorb the contaminants ñ
nutrients available in the
biosolid.
Crop
Utilization
Specific crops utilize certain
nutrients in varying levels.
Available nutrients with specfic
biosolid sources can be tailored
to required crop needs
Groundwater
Table
In order to provide a minimum
level of protection of existing
groundwater supplies, no
utilization program involving
biosolids can occur if the
disposal area is within 900 mm of
the groundwater table.
Clearance to
Surface Water
Any disposal
plot must be located a
minimum of:
50 meters for rapid,
moderate, slow soils, 0-3%
Slope
100 meters for rapid,
moderate, slow soils, 3-6%
Slope
200 meters for rapid,
moderate, slow soils, 6-9%
Slope
Not permitted for moderate to
slow soils, >9% Slope
Drinking Water
Supplies
Any disposal
plot must be located a
minimum of:
15 meters for drilled wells
>15 meters in depth
90 meters for all other types
of wells, including dug well
Residences
Any disposal plot must be located
a minimum of:
90 meters for any private
residence
450 meters for residential areas
Groundwater
Protection
In order to protect the existing
ground water supplies, a minimum
clearance distance (vertical) of
900 mm is required, to provide an
optimum treatment horizon
(physical, chemical, biological
treatment)
Public
Acceptance
Public concern over biosolid use
is commonly related to matters
related to odours, air bourne
drift or surface run-off. To
minimize these concerns, the
Guidelines incorporate minimum
clearance distances. Clearance
distances are affected by the
type of spreading
Soil Criteria
Dense clays, poor
draining or excessive soils are
not acceptable for the
utilization of biosolids for
organic soil conditioning. Waste
materials can be applied to
mineral soils, but not organic
soils.Organic soils are soils
which contain 17% or more organic
carbon by weight, and which have
a depth of 0.4 meters or more
unconsolidated organic material.
Soil Tests
In order to
utilize specific soil plots for
organic soil conditioning, tests
for soil pH, phosphorous and
heavy metal content are required.
Reflects geographical difference
in area across the province, to
ensure that the practice of
biosolid utilization does not
pose a detriment to the
environment
Biosolid
Spreading
To minimize the
risk of runoff, spreading is
discouraged during frozen or ice
covered conditions. Slope of the
disposal plot must be less than
3%. Where surface run off is
expected, waste materials should
not be applied, or clearance
distances should be increased
Spreading
Restrictions Public Health and
Pathogens
Dependent upon
the type of crop, spreading
practices should not occur:
Hay and
Haylage 3 weeks before
grazing
Pasture
(horses, cattle)- 2
months before grazing
Commercial
Sod 12 months before
harvest
Vegetables
12 months before
harvest.
Waste Handling
In order to
minimize the public health
concerns for handlers of
biosolids, care must be taken to
handle such materials in a safe
manner. Persons dealing with
biosolids must operate/use
equipment in such a manner so as
to not endanger themselves.
Follow requirements for entry
into confined spaces as required
under the Occupational Health and
Safety Act
Responsibilities
It is the
responsibility of all parties
involved to adequately safeguard
against any action, which may
result in degradation of the
natural environment, groundwater
or surface water supplies of
Ontario.
Complaints
Where the
utilization of biosolids on
agricultural lands results in
condition or conditions, which
are not in compliance with the
Guidelines, MOE regulations, or
established practices for
biosolid disposal, such
complaints are to be forwarded
to:
The
District Office of the
Ministry of Environment
The local
staff of the Ontario
Ministry of Agriculture
Food and Rural Affairs
The local
Medical Officer of Health
So what's at
Risk?
Overall, the
practice of biosolid utilization
has to be viewed as risk
assessment of the pro's and con's
of the practice.
Are the
wastes buried in the
landfill less or more
detrimental to the
environment?
Are the
sampling and testing
protocols established by
the MOE and OMAFRA
stringent enough to
protect and safeguard
public health and
drinking water supplies?
What's the
Choice?
As part of the
evolution of municipal services
and protection of discharges to
the surface water of the
environment, improved treatment
measures has resulted in greater
biosolid production. To discharge
this material and bury
underground does not fully
utilize the nutrient benefit of
the compound.
Risk
Assessment
Overall , the practice of
biosolid utilization does not
work in all parts of Ontario, and
not all biosolids are suitable
for this program. Sources which
do not meet the criteria for
disposal in this manner are not
eligible. Sites which do not meet
the limited parameters are not
suitable.
Taken into
Context...
Thousands of
private on-site sewage systems
discharge partially treated
effluent, with no secondary or
tertiary level of treatment to
the groundwater table. Most
on-site sewage systems have no
maintenance or monitoring program
to ensure proper operation of
effluent characteristics.
Time for Change
If the analysis,
stringent control measures,
approval process, sampling,
testing, evaluation and on-going
monitoring of biosolid
utilization reduces the amount of
material that is buried, instead
of being utilized for some
practical purpose, then this
practice should be fostered and
explored.
|